What can the RDC issue after an appeal to TCCUT within 28 days?

The correct choice indicates that the RDC can issue a final decision that is published and leads to the enactment of disciplinary measures after an appeal to TCCUT within the specified timeframe. This reflects the authority of the RDC to conclude disciplinary proceedings by providing a definitive outcome that is accessible to the public, thereby maintaining transparency and accountability in regulatory practices.

Publishing the decision and implementing disciplinary measures serves multiple purposes: it ensures that the community is informed about the actions taken regarding disciplinary matters and reinforces the regulatory body's commitment to upholding professional standards. The public nature of the decision also helps to deter future violations by highlighting the consequences of misconduct.

In the context of the regulatory framework, publishing final decisions is essential for fostering trust in the enforcement process and ensuring that all stakeholders are aware of the implications of professional conduct. This contributes to the overall integrity of the regulatory environment.

The other options do not align with the authority and practices of the RDC after an appeal. While preliminary results or notices of intent may be part of other processes, they do not represent the finality and binding nature of a decision that leads to disciplinary action.